Tag Archives: News Blog

<img data-attachment-id="1678584" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2019/06/ask-bark-did-i-throw-away-the-key-to-a-new-car/shutterstock_731078407/" data-orig-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-5.jpg" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="inflatable tube man wacky waving style dealer lot" data-image-description="

Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-2.jpg" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled.jpg" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1678584" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled.jpg" alt width="610" height="407" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled.jpg 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-1.jpg 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-2.jpg 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-3.jpg 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-4.jpg 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/study-automotive-debt-is-out-of-control-youre-being-swindled-5.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">

Consumer Reports just released the findings of a year-long study looking into the latest trends in automotive loans and car payments. The resulting information highlights just how explosive the debt growth has been over the last 10 years and the arbitrary way in which borrowers are now being treated.

Long story short, we’re all being swindled.

With vehicle prices ballooning and the associated loans becoming longer than ever, dealers and lenders seem to be operating whatever way yields the steepest profit margins with only a modicum of consideration being given to the established frameworks designed to act as a guard rail. This has led to U.S. citizens carrying around a record $1.37 trillion in automotive load debt and customers with good credit being treated no different than those that fall into the subprime category. Sadly, the issue appears only appears to be worsening as new economic perils are only making things more expensive. Meanwhile, data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is projecting national auto debt to swell to $1.42 trillion by year’s end. 

For the sake of comparison, Americans were only on the hook for $710 billion going into 2011. But the amount of debt being hauled behind us is only part of the story. Consumer Reports has used the study to assert that vehicles are eating up an increasingly large share of household incomes, citing nearly 858,000 loans from 17 major auto lenders.

From CR:

Today, Americans with new-car loans make an average monthly payment approaching $600 — up roughly 25 percent from a decade ago.

Most borrowers pay their loan with no problem. But in recent years, tens of thousands of consumers have found themselves in financial sinkholes after receiving high-interest, longer-term auto loans that, like the Maryland resident, put them at serious risk of default, CR’s investigation found.

This is happening as total auto loan debt held by Americans has increased dramatically over the past 10 years, surpassing $1.4 trillion — more than the gross domestic product of Australia. Because of recently skyrocketing prices for new and used cars, that debt is likely to grow even more.

“You’re not helping somebody to get a car if the odds are they’re going to lose it,” says Kathleen Engel, research professor at Suffolk University Law School in Boston who studies subprime financial products and is also the vice chair of CR’s board of directors. “That’s not getting somebody a car. That’s taking their money.”

Worse yet is that it’s not unheard of to see APRs surpassing 25 percent and lenders don’t seem to care who the customer is. While credit scores were invented back in the 1950s, under the auspices of delivering a standardized and impartial way of determining the creditworthiness of individual customers, the FICO score system used today didn’t appear until 1989. But it’s often been accused of allowing lenders to enact predatory stipulations on loans going to those with less-than-desirable numbers, particularly as the system has seen broader use.

Credit scores no longer apply exclusively to mortgage applications and loans. They’re now being included as part of some rental agreements and even job applications. It’s gotten to the point where we’ve begun to see pushback, often with claims that scoring doesn’t accurately represent debt risk and functionally serves to keep certain individuals from achieving upward mobility. While we’re not going to be diving into that, CR has asserted that the arbitrary nature of credit scoring has become a serious issue.

The outlet suggested that dealers and lenders are setting interest rates based upon something other than the standard loan underwriting practices. Instead, they’re conducting business in whatever manner “they think they can get away with” because many borrowers have no idea that they can (and should) negotiate terms or pit lenders/dealers against each other in hopes of getting a better bargain. Some of this is down to the legal and regulatory disparities between states. Though the outcome is the issue of focus because it’s in danger of permanently upending the economy when a meaningful percentage of the population can no longer afford to drive:

For one thing, it makes it harder to build the savings needed to purchase a car outright, says Pamela Foohey, a professor at the Cardozo School of Law in New York City who has published several studies on auto lending. Longer-term car loans — the average is now about six years — compound the problem, she says, trapping people in debt to fund a necessity like transportation.

“The trap for consumers, of course, is a boon to lenders,” Foohey says.

Falling behind on car payments can lead to repossession, triggering a cascade of other problems.

Lana Ash of Oklahoma and Dennis Lamar of Connecticut both had their vehicles repossessed last year in the middle of the pandemic, after getting stuck with high-APR car loans that proved to be more expensive than they could afford. Without a car, Lamar had to bum rides to doctors’ appointments. Ash had to take out another loan to fix a busted transmission on an old car.

“To this day, I still get emotional and upset about it,” Ash says.

Many Americans have faced similar outcomes. By spring 2021, an estimated 1 in 12 people with a car loan or lease, or almost 8 million Americans, were more than 90 days late on their car payments, according to a CR analysis of data from the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Philadelphia.

The resulting scenario has left us with a non-comparative automotive market where big businesses and banks can more effectively take advantage of their own customers. CR claimed that 46 percent of the 800,000+ loans reviewed were underwater, with owners owing $3,700 more (on average) than what the vehicle was actually worth. But we’re still just scratching the surface on how dark this is all becoming.

Consumer Reports utilized information disclosed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2019 and 2020 to investors of auto loan bonds, rounding out its research pool with thousands of pages of regulatory filings, court records, trade publications, industry reports, financial records, public documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, and interviews with more than 90 federal and state regulators, advocacy organizations, consumers, lawyers, legal experts, academics, and industry groups.

That data led to a few realizations, starting with the fact that your credit score is largely arbitrary when it comes to how vicious your auto loan is going to be. While there was a prevalence of individuals with scores exceeding 720 to receive better terms, literally everyone (including subprime borrowers) was subjected to APRs ranging between zero and 25 percent. CR likewise worried that lenders were intentionally putting customers into loans they couldn’t possibly afford, with over half of all subprime borrowers getting stuck with payments that were higher than 10 percent of their annual income. But almost none of the lenders bothered to check up on that, resulting in 96 percent of all auto loans going to people who never had their income verified.

This has likewise resulted in a surge of delinquencies over the last few years and a staggering increase in the amount of debt being carried around by Americans. But perhaps most alarming is how nobody seems interested in adhering to the underwriting practices that were supposedly put into place to keep things running smoothly in the fairest possible manner. Credit scores seem to be used to punish the subprime market without really offering much protection to those with good scores.

Consumer Reports said that it reached out to all 17 lenders covered in the analysis, in addition to industry groups like the American Financial Services Association and the National Automotive Finance Association. Some opted not to respond, with everyone declining to answer every question posed. Most also made assertions that consumers have the ability to make informed decisions for themselves and that there’s a wealth of information online for those interested.

Industry groups and financial institutions likewise claimed that auto lending was sufficiently regulated in the United States, suggesting that CR research failed to “contain enough information to accurately compare the loans similarly situated borrowers received.” Double-digit interest rates were dismissed as anomalies while the increased number of delinquencies and repossessions were dismissed entirely as they saw themselves as the only way for some customers to get vehicular loans.

“Consumers understand that rates will vary from creditor to creditor,” said Ed McFadden, a spokesperson for the American Financial Services Association. “They have ample opportunity to research and shop.”

Considering extended loan terms and a slightly higher interest rate can effectively add thousands onto even a modestly priced vehicle, it’s not difficult to see why CR is so critical of modern lending practices. There’s really no other way to spin this. Consumers are either morons, unworthy of being cut fairer deals, or financial institutions (and the dealership intermediaries) are predatory assholes that never seem to assume responsibility for their actions. And it’s all going to continue to be exacerbated as vehicle prices increase and automakers attempt to shift toward a direct sales model that further nullifies customers’ ability to negotiate payments.

This is like how modern safety requirements technically make it borderline impossible for new manufacturers to exist or any of my other anti-regulatory rants. CR has identified several industries working together to use the existing principles in whatever way yields them the most money. If you have some spare time, I highly suggest reading the entire report and inspecting the relevant investigative materials. It’s quite good, loaded with specific examples of the aforementioned problems, and written by Ryan Felton — who is adept at putting together these kinds of stories.

[Image: Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

<img data-attachment-id="1776420" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups/2019-ram-2500-hd/" data-orig-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-5.png" data-orig-size="1420,937" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="2019 Ram 2500 HD" data-image-description="

Ram

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-2.png" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups.png" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1776420" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups.png" alt width="610" height="403" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups.png 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-1.png 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-2.png 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-3.png 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-4.png 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/nhtsa-investigating-rams-diesel-pickups-5.png 1420w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation into nearly 605,000 heavy-duty Ram trucks. A report from the regulator’s Office of Defects Investigation has tabulated 22 complaints from the 2019 and 2020 model years, all of which use 6.7-liter Cummins turbo diesel engines, spurring the NHTSA to launch a formal investigation. Complaints revolve around loss of motive power, with most incidents occurring above 25 mph and resulting in the “permanent disablement of the vehicle.”

While the public was not made aware of the investigation until Monday, the agency launched its probe last Thursday on October 14th. The goal will be to establish how widespread the presumed defect is, what exactly caused it, and any potential safety hazards relating to the issue. Some headway has already been made, however. 

Back in 2019, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (now Stellantis) issued Warranty Bulletin D-19-02 to dealers. The memo requested stores participate in a campaign to “collect, monitor and correct quality issues” on certain MY 2018-2020 Ram trucks equipped with the 6.7-liter Cummins. The NHTSA’s action summary states that this resulted in FCA and an unnamed supplier collecting and inspecting high-pressure fuel pumps.

Vehicles under suspicion include all Ram 2500, 3500, 4500, and 5500 HD pickups from the 2019-2020 MY. The NHTSA plans on looking into the trucks to determine whether or not it needs to press Stellantis to launch a recall. That means asking the manufacturer to give its take on the situation while it compiles warranty claims, injury reports, and whatever FCA previously had on those suspect fuel pumps.

Regulators have been incredibly hard on diesel vehicles ever since Volkswagen’s emissions scandal upended the industry in 2015. While a part of me wants to believe the NHTSA just has it out for Ram’s HD lineup (since a few have asked), it seems far more plausible that this was a standard, shrug-your-shoulders defect. Selective environmental regulations have made diesels cost more as they’ve gradually amassed a bevy of pollutant controlling hardware while also complicating powertrains to a point that has lessened their overall effectiveness. But the impact this has had on their reliability is less obvious and may have nothing to do with a bunch of subpar fuel pumps.

Let’s face it, U.S. regulators haven’t been shy about hitting manufacturers with emissions-focused recalls backed by the Environmental Protection Agency and/or California Air Resources Board in the past. If they wanted to chide Cummins or FCA/Stellantis over pollution, they could have done so overtly.

Stellantis has said it plans on cooperating with the NHTSA fully, launching an investigation of its own for good measure. So we should have some answers soon, including the name of the supplier. In the meantime, you might want to keep a closer eye on how your HD Ram is running if it falls under the purview of the investigation.

[Image: Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

<img data-attachment-id="1774900" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan/1971-maserati-quattroporte-3/" data-orig-file="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1971-Maserati-Quattroporte-3.png" data-orig-size="1920,1080" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="1971 Maserati Quattroporte 3" data-image-description="

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJqTZPCsgQ

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-6.png" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan.png" class="aligncenter wp-image-1774900 size-large" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan.png" alt width="610" height="343" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan.png 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-5.png 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-6.png 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-7.png 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-8.png 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-9.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">Today’s Rare Ride was one of just two finished examples of the ill-fated second generation Maserati Quattroporte. Maserati envisioned a promising future for their large luxury sedan, but the company’s corporate parentage at the time had other (worse) ideas.

And this very car was fit for a king.

Maserati produced its first-generation Quattroporte from 1963 to 1969, a very early example of a brand new class of car: the high-performance grand touring sedan. With a large engine at the front and lots of leather in the middle, it was one of three Sixties sedans from Europe able to meet a 200 kph (124 mph) top speed.

<img data-attachment-id="1774898" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan/1971-maserati-quattroporte-4/" data-orig-file="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1971-Maserati-Quattroporte-4.png" data-orig-size="1920,1080" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="1971 Maserati Quattroporte 4" data-image-description="

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJqTZPCsgQ

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-11.png" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-1.png" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1774898" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-1.png" alt width="610" height="343" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-1.png 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-10.png 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-11.png 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-12.png 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-13.png 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-14.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">By the end of the Sixties, the original Quattroporte styling was looking fairly dated. Karim Aga Khan wanted a fresher Quattroporte and ordered up a bespoke sedan. Maserati set to work and built a new four-door on the Indy’s platform. Exterior design was handed to Frua, as the first-gen model was penned by Pietro himself. The new Quattroporte used Maserati’s 4.9-liter V8, good for 296 horsepower. Said power traveled to the rear wheels via an unspecified automatic transmission.

<img data-attachment-id="1774896" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan/1971-maserati-quattroporte-5/" data-orig-file="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1971-Maserati-Quattroporte-5.png" data-orig-size="1920,1080" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="1971 Maserati Quattroporte 5" data-image-description="

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJqTZPCsgQ

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-16.png" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-2.png" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1774896" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-2.png" alt width="610" height="343" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-2.png 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-15.png 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-16.png 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-17.png 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-18.png 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-19.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">The car was production-ready by 1971 and was displayed that year at the Paris Motor Show. Maserati knew there was a market for the new Quattroporte, and sealed its production fate with a new chassis code: AM121. But Maserati’s product plans were no longer their own to dictate, as the company’s ownership had passed from the Orsi family to Citroën in 1968.

<img data-attachment-id="1774904" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan/1971-maserati-quattroporte-2/" data-orig-file="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1971-Maserati-Quattroporte-2.png" data-orig-size="1920,1080" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="1971 Maserati Quattroporte 2" data-image-description="

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJqTZPCsgQ

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-21.png" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-3.png" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1774904" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-3.png" alt width="610" height="343" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-3.png 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-20.png 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-21.png 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-22.png 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-23.png 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-24.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">Citroën took a look at the very Italian and ready-to-go AM121, and said “Mais non, you will not build this car.” The French brass pressed Maserati to move on in a different direction with Quattroporte – a front-drive direction. The basis for the newly-ordered Quattroporte II (AM123) would be Citroën’s own SM luxury coupe. That one was a big flop but we’ll discuss it in another Rare Rides.

<img data-attachment-id="1774906" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan/1971-maserati-quattroporte/" data-orig-file="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1971-Maserati-Quattroporte.png" data-orig-size="1645,1013" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="1971 Maserati Quattroporte" data-image-description="

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJqTZPCsgQ

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-26.png" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-4.png" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1774906" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-4.png" alt width="610" height="376" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-4.png 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-25.png 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-26.png 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-27.png 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/rare-rides-a-1971-maserati-quattroporte-prototype-the-kings-sedan-28.png 120w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">In the end, only two examples of the AM121 Quattroporte were finished. Aga Khan received his (chassis number 004) in 1974. The other finished example was chassis number 002, completed in 1971 and retained by Frua. Frua sold it fairly quickly to the King of Spain, Juan Carlos I. The king’s blue over tan AM121 goes to auction in November at Le Castellet, wherever that is.

Note: Images in this article are of the later 004 chassis, as they were the only ones publicly available for use.

[Images: YouTube]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

<img data-attachment-id="1773672" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw/covid-19vaccinationrecordcardsissuedbycdcunitedstatescenters/" data-orig-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-5.jpg" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2021 Michael Vi\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Covid-19,Vaccination,Record,Cards,Issued,By,Cdc,(united,States,Centers","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Covid-19,Vaccination,Record,Cards,Issued,By,Cdc,(united,States,Centers" data-image-description="

Michael Vi/Shutterstock

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-2.jpg" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw.jpg" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1773672" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw.jpg" alt width="610" height="407" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw.jpg 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-1.jpg 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-2.jpg 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-3.jpg 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-4.jpg 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-being-considered-by-auto-industry-uaw-5.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">

With the Biden administration having announced that it would start requiring companies to vaccinate employees, automakers and UAW are finding themselves in a sticky situation. Unions had previously said they wanted to hold off on endorsing or opposing mandatory vaccinations until after they discussed things with the industry and their own members. Considering Joe Biden said he wouldn’t make vaccines mandatory less than 10 months ago, employers are getting caught with their pants around the proverbial ankles.

Automakers had previously been surveying white-collar workers to see what they wanted to do while upping on-site COVID restrictions, but operating under the impression that any hard decisions were likely a long way off and left entirely to their discretion. Now the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration is planning a new standard that requires all employers with 100 (or more) employees to guarantee their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any unvaccinated workers to produce a negative test result on a minimum weekly basis. 

Employers that fail to implement the stated requirements could face fines of nearly $14,000 per violation, according to the White House, with penalties also doubling for those who refuse to wear masks during interstate travel. Those are potentially steep fees when you’re employees number in the thousands. Union officials have said they’re considering the matter without committing to more than absolutely necessary — though the UAW officially opposed vaccine requirements in the past.

From UAW President Ray Curry:

“The UAW has and continues to strongly encourage all members and their families to be vaccinated unless there is specific health or religious concerns. We know that this is the best way to protect our members, coworkers and their families.

We are reviewing the details of yesterday’s announcements and the impact on our members and our over 700 employer contracts.

In the meantime, we continue our member commitment to practice safety in every one of our worksites by following protocols including masks, sanitizing and reporting any exposure or symptoms of the virus. At the UAW we all understand that fighting this pandemic and protecting our families is key to our survival.”

Assuming the union ultimately decides to endorse the vaccine decree, it’s likely going to be fracturing its membership. While I am hardly against vaccinations, I strongly support informed consent and speaking candidly about this has resulted in autoworkers frequently confessing they’re similarly opposed to forced vaccinations. Many have said they would immediately quit their jobs, matching a recent Washington Post poll claiming 70 percent of unvaccinated workers would simply abandon their positions if vaccine mandates are instituted. It’s my assumption that the industry will have a sudden, catastrophic staffing shortage were it to move forward with the Biden plan.

Automakers have been similarly noncommittal, with manufacturers (including Ford, GM, Stellantis, Honda, and Toyota) stating they encourage staff to get vaccinated and want to adhere to all government-issued health protocols. But they typically steer clear of addressing the Biden plan directly, possibly indicating some hesitancy. That said, it hasn’t even been a full day since the vaccine mandate was announced and their HR and legal departments are probably wringing their hands as they ponder upon what’s to be done and the fallout it might create.

Every statement automakers have been willing to make thus far can be paraphrased into “hold on … we’ve got to think about this,” followed by a paragraph about how they believe in vaccinations and want to adhere to recommendations coming from the relevant health experts. Conversely, very little has been said about the rights or preferences of their employees.

I’m not going to beat around this bush. The entire premise of these mandates seems insane to me, bordering on wicked. As an American, I always thought the whole premise of the country was predicated upon the shared belief that personal liberties and freedom of choice trump everything else. But that doesn’t seem to be what’s coming down from the top anymore. The rhetoric being used by Joe Biden is egregiously confrontational, including statements like “we’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin” as he made sweeping assertions about how the unvaccinated are stifling national unity and progress. He also confusingly stated that vaccinated workers need to be “protected” from the unvaccinated.

Assuming vaccines are effective, shouldn’t it be the other way round? What exactly are we shielding people from when new strains continue to manifest, can still be spread amongst the vaccinated, and the shots we currently have are targeting older COVID variants that have lost steam?

The economic and social stress this is likely to place upon the industry and country as a whole will be nothing short of monumental. Protests have been erupting across the globe all summer. Truckers have started organizing in numerous countries and have refused to deliver to areas imposing strict COVID rules, exacerbating food shortages in urban areas. In the United States, the same was true for cities that opted to defund police departments. Now they’re starting to talk about strikes focused on vaccine and mask mandates while they’re already experiencing a severe shortage of drivers. Imagine if that spills over to an automotive sector that’s already been beleaguered by the semiconductor shortage, their suppliers, and every other industry you rely on.

[Image: Michael Vi/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Our recent Rare Rides coverage of the Chevrolet Citation made one thing very clear: We need more Citation content. Today’s 1982 Buy/Drive/Burn lineup was suggested by commenter eng_alvarado90, who would like to see all of you struggle. Citation, Aries, Escort, all in their most utilitarian formats. Let’s go.

Chevrolet Citation

The Citation is in its third model year for 1982, and sales have already fallen far from their initial peak of 800,000. The bloom is off this rose, but GM is still on track for six-digit sales this year. Sticking firmly to economy and utility, today’s Citation is a five-door hatchback equipped with the 2.5-liter Iron Duke inline-four and paired to a four-speed manual. Throttle-body injection is new this year and means 90 horses are underfoot. There’s also a new horizontal slats grille.

Dodge Aries K

The Dodge Aries is still new and is in its second model year for 1982. Chrysler started out strong last year with over 300,000 sales, and will likely reach that number again in ’82. Today’s Aries is the four-door wagon, as Chrysler does not offer a hatchback K-car at this level. Underhood is the base 2.2-liter Chrysler inline-four, which uses a two-barrel carb. Eighty-four horses are at the driver’s command, shifted through a four-speed manual. New this year: rear windows roll down on sedans and wagons, replacing the fixed glass.

Ford Escort

Ford’s Escort is also in its second model year for 1982. The American market Escort was supposed to be very similar to the European one for parts sharing purposes. However the respective design teams each headed their own direction, and the two cars share only an engine and transmission. Today’s five-door Escort hatchback is new for ’82, along with a new grille and presence of the familiar Ford Blue Oval. The base 1.6-liter CVH engine gets a high output version this year, which increases power by about 10 horses, to 80. Power is delivered to the front via a four-speed Ford MTX manual.

Economy and cheap driving are available to you, and they’ll probably hold up for at least three years before falling apart. Which gets the Buy?

[Images: GM, Chrysler, Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Michele Ursi/Shutterstock.com

The current $7,500 Federal electric vehicle tax incentive could get a boost to $12,500 if the “Clean Energy for America” bill ever makes its way to reality – but it’s absolutely the wrong way to go, in my opinion. And, I know – “Who cares what Jo thinks about EV incentives,” right? Right –except that very, very few people in the industry have as much “green cred” as I do, so maybe you’ll want to give this one a read.

WHAT QUALIFIES AS GREEN CRED

You’re not hallucinating. That is, indeed, Leslie Nielsen unironically (and, hilariously) hawking a Warren Mosler-built Consulier GTP convertible in the pages of the Neiman Marcus catalog. And, yes, it does indeed say “Solar Electric” on the … I guess that’s the hood? Let’s go with hood.

This ad is relevant because, a long, long time ago, I was lucky enough to work for Warren and beyond lucky enough to actually drive some of these fantastic cars – including one of the early US Electricar GTPs. This was the 90s, and these guys were talking about how the battery tech was too far away to make the cars practical, but also talking about things like range-extending generators to keep power flowing on longer trips while taking advantage of electric motors’ low-end torque … all stuff that’s familiar now, almost 30 years later, but seemed like the stuff of fantasy to me, back then.

A few years later –and just a few miles up the road from the old Mosler Auto Care Center – I was at RENNtech, building one of the first hybrid show cars for Mercedes-Benz that would, eventually, go on to win a couple of awards at SEMA.

It was around that time that I met a guy named Nick Chambers, who asked a whole lot of questions about how the RENNtech-built hybrid powertrain worked before eventually telling me, “You actually explain this quite well, do you want to just write the article? I’ll publish it under your name.”

That was in 2008, and I started writing for Nick’s blog, first. Then another one. Then a few more, all while building and racing cars running CNG and ethanol. I was tuning on alternative fuels because, well – I didn’t really believe that electric cars were going to “win” the future. I thought biofuels had a real chance, especially biodiesel, right up until they didn’t.

These days, my 9-5 involves training car dealers to sell EVs by helping to develop tools that explain “electric fuel” in a way that’s easy to understand and simple enough to communicate without the need for engineering jargon and memorization.

So, green cred = nearly 30 years playing with EVs, hybrids, and alt-fuel cars that absolutely did not suck. There’s no climate change denial here, no lack of familiarity with the concepts of the space, and I am very deeply invested in the success of electric vehicles in the marketplace.

Why do I, a consummate green-car guy, think these huge incentives to promote EV sales are a bad idea? I’m glad you asked!

THESE TAX CREDITS ARE DUBIOUSLY POLITICAL

Matt Posky outlined the proposed $12,500 tax credit very nicely in his own article on the matter and summed up his take nicely with the use of a burning pile of money as the featured image. But there’s a passage in his article that I think is worth repeating here.

“While the $7,500 tax credit persists, the bill now adds special exemptions depending on how the vehicle is manufactured,” explains Posky. “For example, the government will tack on another $2,500 if final assembly takes place inside the United States and another $2,500 if the factory in question happens to be represented by a union.” (Emphasis mine.)

This is one of those perfect examples of concerning political language that just about everyone – regardless of whether you identify with the Republicans or Democrats – can take issue with. Huzzah!

On the one hand, that “final assembly” language is incredibly sketch. Does it include vehicles like the Ford Transit Connect, which are fully built in Turkey, then shipped to the US and partially disassembled in order to skirt the Chicken Tax? If you’re a free-market/Right to Work critic, you might argue that this language actually does very little to ensure that the legislation leads to more US-based manufacturing jobs. You might even argue that the government has effectively rewarded exactly the kind of tax-skirting action Ford is being accused of by giving them $2,500 per unit to help absorb the billion-dollars in fines they’re staring down over it.

If you’re a proponent of Right to Work, you might take issue with that second $2,500 bump specifically for union-built vehicles.

Want to buy a Tesla Model 3? They’re not a UAW manufacturer, so you don’t get the $2,500. Or, your $2,500 credit, depending on how you look at it. Want a Volvo C40 Recharge? A Mitsubishi? A BMW i, Mercedes EQS, or VW ID.4?  No $2,500 for you, either.

That second one reads, to me, like a very public bribe being paid out to the UAW – and God bless ‘em, as far as I’m concerned. We don’t talk about the Battle of Blair Mountain enough, these days—but the guys and gals who led that bloody workers’ revolt against the Stone Mountain Coal Company had balls, and whoever wrote this sort of spineless, mealy-mouthed “something for them, something for us” piece of policy clearly does not.

Granted, almost all bipartisan legislation is weak sauce – but that would be forgivable if it was the worst part of these tax credits.

THESE TAX CREDITS HELP THE WRONG PEOPLE

The latest round of proposed EV tax credits imposes a $40,000 price cap on qualifying vehicles. If you’re curious about why they chose that $40,000 as the limit, it was almost certainly because the average transaction price of a new vehicle in 2020 was $40,000 according to Cox Automotive’s smart people.  The problem? That’s nearly $10,000 more than the median annual income in the United States.

Really.

I don’t think you’ll find many financial planners out there telling you to spend 130 percent of your annual income on a new car, but that’s exactly the thinking that the people advocating for these kinds of new vehicle incentives seem to be pushing – and that means one of two things: either they’re truly clueless about how the bottom 50 percent of the population lives, or they don’t care.

I, admittedly, tend to fall on the “politicians don’t care about voters, they care about donors” side of these things. Even so, it seems to me that a better way to distribute these tax incentives would be to give individuals making less than $40,000 per year $12,500 to go buy an EV – any EV, not just a new one.

Doing so would, almost overnight, wipe out the national inventory of used Nissan LEAFs, Mercedes Bs, BMW i3s, etc., and transform the class of people least likely to buy an EV into the class of people most likely to buy an EV.

If you’re about upward mobility and social justice and the redistribution of resources, you have to kind of love that idea. If you’re genuinely interested in taking the most polluting, least safe vehicles off the road, you have to love that idea. If you believe that inner-city and low-income populations are disproportionately impacted by harmful vehicle emissions and air pollution you have to at least kind of like it a little. Heck, even if you already own an EV, you’d probably be happy about getting an extra few g’s out of it when it comes time to trade it in for a newer one.

I imagine the other side would argue that it’s unfair to reward failure or that brown people shouldn’t have EVs – but no opinion piece is really complete without a straw man or two thrown in, right?

Right.

But, obviously, I’m no policy expert. I’m sure I’m missing some super relevant and blatantly obvious argument that makes my idea seem laughable – so let’s hear it in the comments. You’re the Best and Brightest, after all, so scroll on down to the bottom of the article and tell us how you think those EV tax dollars might best be used in the comments.

[Lead Image: Michele Ursi/Shutterstock.com. All other images courtesy of the author.]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Not long ago, Rare Rides featured the Gurgel XEF, a Brazilian microcar of luxurious intent that was styled like a contemporary Mercedes-Benz, and based on a Volkswagen. Today’s Rare Ride is a very different Brazilian take on the same basic bones.

Say hello to the Renha Formigão.

Renha was short for Renha Indústria e Comércio de Veículos, which in English meant Renha Industry and Commerce of Vehicles. Founded in Rio de Janeiro, the company was the creation of Paulo Sérgio Renha. Renha was a powerboat racing enthusiast and held a speed record in the Atlantic for a crossing from Santos to Rio de Janeiro.

Renha previously designed some buggies and cars for other Brazilian firms and decided to found his own car company in 1977. The firm’s original product was a trike with a Volkswagen engine. The initial iteration of the trike faced legislative hurdles, as it occupied a vehicle class not yet recognized by the Brazilian government. Renha revised the trike after its initial debut and added more power and different bodywork, and was able to get it past legalization. It was sold as a kit or a complete bike.

The next year Renha had more ambitious ideas and launched the Formigão. The very small pickup truck body was attached directly to a Volkswagen Beetle chassis. It used a 1.6-liter gas/ethanol engine. Renha created his own body but made no mechanical changes underneath.

Said body was designed in fiberglass, focused on utility, and was shaped mostly by a ruler. Renha got some headlamps from a Fiat 127 to complete the square look. The pickup bed could hold up to 1,433 pounds, and its size capacity was about 25 cubic feet.

The bed capacity was not as utilitarian as one would hope, however. Volkswagen would not supply the flat design 1.6 from its second-generation Bus to outside companies, so Renha had to make do with the Beetle’s engine in its truck. As a result, there was a pronounced rectangular elevation in the bed.

Inside, buyers found three-point seatbelts and rode along with the spare tire and battery that resided behind the seats. A luxury trim was also available which offered upgraded alloy wheels, leather seats that reclined, and a useful tachometer.

Formigão remained in production for a short while, as in 1980 Paulo Renha moved on to a newly founded company called Emis and produced his trike there. Formigão was reborn in 1986 as the Coyote, after the company obtained rights from Renha. By that time, Mr. Renha had moved back into his real passion – boats – and started a ship-building firm.

Today’s Rare Ride is a 1979 Formigão from near the conclusion of initial production. With alloy wheels, it’s most likely the upscale luxury model. From the photos, it seems the engine bump issue in the bed was fixed by a later owner, or by Renha later in production. This tiny truck is yours for $14,000.

[Images: Renha]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Porsche

Porsche is asking its 1,300 suppliers to only use renewable energy as they manufacture Porsche parts, starting this month.

The German automaker is doing so in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

This change applies to any supplier awarded a contract for providing production material for new-vehicle projects. Suppliers who can’t or won’t comply will no longer be considered for Porsche contracts over the long term.

“Our battery cell suppliers have already had to use green energy since 2020. And now we are taking the next important step: we stipulate that our series suppliers also use only renewable energy to produce our components, to help reduce CO2-emissions even further. We recognise that we have a responsibility to ensure that supply chains are transparent and sustainable,” Uwe-Karsten Städter, member of the executive board for procurement at Porsche AG said in a statement.

It’s all part of a larger goal the company has set to be carbon dioxide neutral across the entire supply chain by 2030. As it stands now, the company’s supply chain is responsible for about 20 percent of the company’s total greenhouse-gas emissions, with it projected to rise to 40 percent as electrification becomes more prevalent.

“By using only renewable energy sources, our suppliers are following our example in our efforts to reach CO2-neutrality. We plan to have even more intensive talks with our partners in order to drive forward improvements in our sustainability. It is only by working together that we will be able to combat ongoing climate change,” said Städter.

Porsche is also trying to reduce emissions from its own plants — the company claims that production of the Taycan is carbon-neutral since 2019, for example, and that the same holds true for the 911 and 718 since 2020 and the plant that produces the Macan and Panamera since 2021.

It’s not as ambitious as having an EV Day, but Porsche, like everyone these days, is making claims about its ability to be green.

[Image: Porsche]

<img data-attachment-id="1766152" data-permalink="https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes/marijuanaanddriving-dontdrivehigh-carkeysand/" data-orig-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-5.jpg" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2017 Mitch M\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Marijuana,And,Driving-,Don't,Drive,High,-,Car,Keys,And","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="Marijuana car keys THC dope weed dui" data-image-description="

Mitch M/Shutterstock

" data-medium-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-2.jpg" data-large-file="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes.jpg" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1766152" src="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes.jpg" alt width="610" height="407" srcset="http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes.jpg 610w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-1.jpg 75w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-2.jpg 450w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-3.jpg 768w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-4.jpg 120w, http://theautomotivearchaeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/iihs-claims-marijuana-legalization-causes-crashes-5.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px">

It’s always nice to get a break from the endless stream of industry marketing materials about electrification, though this week’s impromptu theme still involves going green. Following news that General Motors is considering changing its drug testing policies to exclude marijuana, there has been heavy coverage of an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) study claiming states that have legalized recreational use of cannabis are seeing more crashes.

But the framing seems wildly irresponsible as it fails to highlight the problem being heavily tied to individuals operating a vehicle under the influence of marijuana and alcohol combined. It’s more or less what the IIHS attempted to do in 2018 with help from the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI). Our guess is that the duo is seeking out fresh reasons for insurance companies to raise rates in regions that have legalized pot because even their own research complicates the issue. 

Their latest data suggests that legalization and retail sales of cannabis in California, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington resulted in a 6 percent increase in injury crash rates and a 4 percent increase in fatal crash rates compared with other Western states where pot was illegal at the time of the study. The IIHS and HLDI have actually conducted a series of studies since 2014, with the outcome often the same. But it’s at odds with a study released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in 2015, which came to the conclusion that THC wasn’t contributing to an increase in accidents.

Independent tests and surveys have been a mixed bag. The majority seem to agree that cannabis consumption typically slows driver reaction times and makes it harder to focus. But regular users don’t tend to suffer from these side effects and the abundance of caution THC hilariously might make some stoners better drivers. Simulations have likewise shown them to be less likely to speed or act aggressively in traffic and they typically increase following distances (something the IIHS noted). There are even instances where testing has shown subjects declining to get behind a wheel in a real-world setting, after stating they didn’t feel comfortable driving high.

There’s been no consensus on whether or not smoking pot makes you a menace behind the wheel but the early data seems to suggest not. So then why are the IIHS and HLDI claiming otherwise? Because they can incorporate alcohol on the sly.

In fact, the latest from those outlets used data collected from injured drivers visiting emergency rooms in Sacramento, California; Denver, Colorado; and Portland, Oregon — none of which represented an increased risk associated with marijuana unless it was combined with booze. Of the 1,200 people examined, none of the drivers that tested positive for smoking weed were injured at a higher rate than those who were sober. But the ones that were drinking and also decided to puff the magic dragon did see elevated numbers.

This isn’t a recommendation to get stoned and hop into a vehicle. We wouldn’t advise using any mind-altering substance to someone preparing to drive an automobile and being sober offers some pretty clear tactical advantages. However, the framing of these studies is often misleading and unhelpful in terms of deciding future legislation in a truly effective manner.

If you’re hoping for an outlet that actually seems interested in getting to the bottom of things without a lot of spin, the American Automobile Association (AAA) has frequently shown itself capable of nuance. It’s looked into the issue to and decided that the most serious issue is likely people partying themselves into oblivion using a variety of substances. The AAA Foundation’s annual Traffic Safety Culture Index found that drivers who use both marijuana and alcohol “were significantly more prone to driving under the influence of alcohol alone versus those who only drink alcohol but do not use marijuana.

The outlet also made it clear that it does not support the “legalization of recreational marijuana because of its inherent traffic safety risks and the difficulties in writing legislation that protects the public and treats drivers fairly.” It apparently just sees boozing as the bigger issue and full-on partying behind the wheel as the worst-case scenario for motorists. It’s an interesting report and well worth reading for the added context and rather clear statistical information.

But that doesn’t make the IIHS content totally worthless. Despite our criticizing the group for framing the issue in a specific manner, those who bother to read the entirety of their article still end up learning that alcohol plays a significant factor. It even references the above AAA report and eventually suggests that disparities in state and local regulations might be influencing driver behaviors and the tabulated data. We’re just annoyed that it makes these sweeping assertions using somewhat specious reasoning and limited information. No study appears to have a handle on exactly how much cannabis consumption impairs motorists and most of the data we’ve seen seems to indicate it varies wildly from person to person. Knowing that simply has not stopped the IIHS from jumping to conclusions.

“Our latest research makes it clear that legalizing marijuana for recreational use does increase overall crash rates,” IIHS-HLDI President David Harkey said in a statement. “That’s obviously something policymakers and safety professionals will need to address as more states move to liberalize their laws — even if the way marijuana affects crash risk for individual drivers remains uncertain.”

Policymakers and safety professionals have been placed on notice. Even though there are still glaring questions surrounding the matter, it’s time for them to address these issues as the scourge of hypothetical dope fiends revving their engines in a fit of refer madness is upon us.

[Image: Mitch M/Shutterstock]

Rare Rides has featured a couple of fine Lagonda sedans previously. First was the 1980s rectangle designed by William Towns, which miraculously remained in production from 1976 to 1990. Next was the Lagonda Taraf, a super sedan intended only for the oil-flush UAE market.

Today we bring you the genesis of the Aston Martin Lagonda sedan line, the Rapide.

The Rapide was developed during David Brown’s ownership of Aston Martin. If you recall, Brown also saw the development of the Rover Metro into the luxury Aston Martin Frazer Tickford Metro. In the early Sixties, Mr. Brown owned Aston Martin and the deceased Lagonda brand. Though he purchased the Lagonda marque in 1948, Lagonda had faded away in 1958. The company made a very small number of coupes post-WWII, with Aston Martin engines.

The Rapide was a luxurious, V12-engined car at Lagonda in the Thirties, and Mr. Brown decided it was that name which should revive Lagonda. Design work was handed off to Carrozzeria Touring, the sedan based on the contemporary DB4 coupe. Though it shared a basis, the sedan’s 196-inch length was considerably longer than the 177 inches of the DB4. Touring applied a split grille design with three sections to the Rapide, and quad headlamps additionally separated Lagonda from Aston Martin’s corporate styling. It took three years to develop the Rapide, and the large sedan entered production in 1961.

An early super sedan, Rapide used an enlarged straight-six of 4.0-liters that was notably more potent than the 3.6 found in the DB4. Featuring dual overhead cams, the 4.0 would later see use in the DB5 and produced 236 horses in Rapide implementation. That made for a very quick-for-1961 run to 60 of 8.9 seconds. The Rapide debuted other features used in the later DB5: a de Dion rear suspension, and a body composed of a magnesium-aluminum alloy. Most Rapides were automatic and routed their power through a three-speed Borg-Warner unit, though a select few were ordered with a four-speed manual.

Extremely expensive, the Rapide was around £5,000 when it was new. That figure was 25 percent higher than a DB4, and twice the price of a Jaguar MKX or E-Type. Between 1961 and 1964, just 55 examples were produced. Aston Martin would not make another sedan until the Lagonda of 1974 mentioned above. And that was well after the conclusion of David Brown’s Aston/Lagonda ownership.

Today’s red over tan Rare Ride is presently at auction and ends bidding tomorrow. Current ask is £70,000 and it isn’t at its reserve. Probably not even close.

[Images: Aston Martin]